View Single Post
01-18-2013, 05:13 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,600
vCash: 500
Always believed this: Geno's high is Lemieuxesque (or prime Jagr), in the sense that he just totally controls the flow of the game.

Great/'On' Geno > Great/'On' Sid. BUT, you see great Sid with a lot more consistency (then again, in Geno's defense, if he were consistently as great as he sometimes can be, he'd be Mario 2.0, and we're never going to see that again).

Average/Good Sid > Average/Good Geno. Nobody should debate that.

I also think that Sid is a player who is a perfect fit for Bylsma's system, while Geno is a better fit for a more defensively oriented, trapping system. Just a thought . . .

KIRK is offline   Reply With Quote