P.K. Subban Thread - Mk III - Unsigned Edition
View Single Post
01-19-2013, 11:45 AM
Join Date: Sep 2007
Originally Posted by
Your point makes no sense based on what we're seeing now.
So the non-signing happens because they can't live with the guy? And what if he signs? They will then be able to live with him?
If true that he's such a pain in the ass, trade him. But trade him in a way that you will get the greatest return for him. Yet, while he might not be the easiest guy to live with it, I have way more problems with the leadership of this team if it's indeed true. I know a couple of vets in this league that would shut PK up and knock him out if needed so he'd quiet down. In here, they just dislike the way he conducts himself, well show him how it has to be done.
Bergevin said he wants to see PK by himself before signing him long term. He probably heard "things", maybe some players even talked to him. But at the same time, he knows he's got a gem of a player in PK and you don't throw away this king of player.
So logically, he wants to sign him to a short deal, to see what a coach like Therrien can do with him. If it doesn't get better, he'll be easier to trade with a short deal than a 6 years contract.
From a management point of view, a bridge contract is the only logical option.
View Public Profile
HTTP 400's albums
Find More Posts by HTTP 400