View Single Post
Old
01-19-2013, 11:09 PM
  #243
DAChampion
Registered User
 
DAChampion's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Country: United States
Posts: 15,439
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorinth View Post
That's hardly completely different. A Gill is not that hard to acquire. So in essence
OUT - Cammalleri, Kostitsyn, Hamrlik and Wisniewski
IN - Cole, Bourque, Markov, Gorges

That's a fairly even trade off if Markov can get back to his old self. Which admittedly is a huge question mark.
False comparison of the D.

The 2010-2011 D had Markov, Subban, Gorges, Hamrlik, Wisniewski;
The 2012-2013 D has Markov, Subban, Gorges;

You can argue that Markov was injured in 2010-2011, but there are injuries every year. It didn't need to be Markov, it could have been Hamrlik or Subban or Gorges. The point is that the 2010-2011 team was so good it could lose a top-4 dmen to injury and still have 4 top-4 dmen. Lose a top-4 dmen to injury from the 2012-2013 team and the team will be really bad.

I started following the Habs seriously, as in posting on boards and thus thinking about the situation in detail as opposed to being spoonfed by RDS, around 2007 or 2008. One thing I noticed is that every summer I saw the same argument, "next year when the Habs have no injures we will be a better team". I bought into it the first time, I was probably one of those people that thought the 2007-08 playoff elimination was due to Streit being injured. But eventually I noticed it was a ****** argument, because the same argument was being made every summer.

Here's the thing: there are injuries every single year. There will be injuries this year. It doesn't need to be Markov, in fact it probably won't be Markov, but either way our roster looks like last-place-worthy once you remove a whole lot of players.

DAChampion is offline   Reply With Quote