Most Dominant athlete: Wayne Gretzky vs Wilt Chamberlain
View Single Post
01-20-2013, 05:24 PM
Long Duk Dong
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beaver Falls, PA
Originally Posted by
Anyone having Ruth as #1 has to give their head a shake.
1st of all he did not have a HOF career at SP, his record was 94-46 with 1 great season, one very good one and 2 decent ones.
2nd when Ruth hit more Home Runs than an entire team does in his early HR heroics, it was because other teams weren't trying to hit HR's the conventional wisdom of the day was to put the ball into play and get men on base.
The 3rd point is the most important, people forget that baseball was segregated and Ruth played in a white only league. It would be the equivalent of a hockey player playing in a Canadian only league post early 90's.
The fact of the matter is how competitive could the league really be when Ruth was getting drunk and ******* it up before games on a frequent basis? Probably quite a bit lower than at later stages and especially after baseball became integrated.
Oh my God, come on now. How competitive could the NHL be in Gretzky's era when many were voluntarily giving themselves cancer via cigarettes along with the usual booze and vast amounts of fornication with women that usually happens when a young athlete makes a ton of money. Not to mention the NHL didn't "integrate" Europeans for the most part until the mid 90's.
Babe Ruth doesn't count because he didn't play against black guys, had sex and drank beer?
Long Duk Dong
View Public Profile
Long Duk Dong's albums
Find More Posts by Long Duk Dong