The Armchair GM Thread - Part XXXI - Nobody Loves Raymond Edition
View Single Post
01-20-2013, 07:04 PM
Cult of Personality
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Surrey, BC
Originally Posted by
They lose faster.
Being awesome in 3 games is great, but when you are absolutely awful in the other 4 it really doesn't mean much.
At least for goalies. If the Sedin's had been awesome in 3 of the games then the Canucks might have won the series. Blame to go all around, that's true.
What the Luongo apologists don't seem to understand, getting shutout doesn't excuse bad goaltending.
Compare it with the Anaheim series, the forwards were the problem. The main difference between that and the Boston series was that Luongo kept them in every game. He was there best player every night. Against Boston he was awful 4 of the games.
Didn't realize that giving up 3 goals in a game constitutes being absolutely awful. That's a new one.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by y2kcanucks