View Single Post
01-20-2013, 07:04 PM
Cult of Personality
y2kcanucks's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 46,463
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to y2kcanucks
Originally Posted by serge2k View Post
They lose faster.

Being awesome in 3 games is great, but when you are absolutely awful in the other 4 it really doesn't mean much.

At least for goalies. If the Sedin's had been awesome in 3 of the games then the Canucks might have won the series. Blame to go all around, that's true.

What the Luongo apologists don't seem to understand, getting shutout doesn't excuse bad goaltending.

Compare it with the Anaheim series, the forwards were the problem. The main difference between that and the Boston series was that Luongo kept them in every game. He was there best player every night. Against Boston he was awful 4 of the games.
Didn't realize that giving up 3 goals in a game constitutes being absolutely awful. That's a new one.

y2kcanucks is offline