Redden@$800k vs Barker@$700k
View Single Post
01-21-2013, 09:47 AM
Join Date: Jan 2013
Originally Posted by
It seems many are praising the signing of Redden and criticizing the signing of Barker, who is the better signing?
This is a great poll perhaps one of the most interesting comparisons ive seen on these boards. Admittedly i havent watch much of Barker or seem him play recently. All i hear is that he is a bust and didnt do much with Edmonton. It seems Canuck fans are expecting the same this year. Having low expectations for a guy drafted so high on a new team is alarming.On the otherhand, Redden in his prime is everything Barker was supposed to be.
A faded star or a low ceiling highly touted former high pick both making relatively the same cash?
People are saying that Redden was decent in the minors.
Barker is a never been while Redden is a has been.
Redden to me has the better potential to contribute and is playing for a team that focuses on D more.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BROOKLYnKNIGHTS