Redden@$800k vs Barker@$700k
View Single Post
01-21-2013, 07:00 PM
Feed Your Head
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North American Scum
I must admit I am fairly shocked by the results. Obviously, much of the landslide has to do with Canucks hate, but if I were a GM I would be looking at a top 5 draft pick (in the last few years) to produce, rather than a mid-30s yrd old top 5 draft pick to produce.
They both have much to prove and for equal money if I were a GM I would invest in a 'perhaps potential' rather than a likely 'has been'.
I wonder how the results would be if Barker signed with St.L. and Redden with Vancouver.
Either way, both are low cost/risk signings with potential high upsides. Will be interesting to see both over the shortened season.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Belamorte