Vandermeer Waived (UPD: Clears - Jan 22)
View Single Post
01-21-2013, 11:59 PM
Join Date: Jul 2010
Originally Posted by
But - Cam Barker has so far proved to be exactly what several other teams discovered (as he demonstrated in two Canuck scrimmages) - an awful defenceman. Whereas Vandermeer is a slow, unspectacular, but tough and dedicated defenceman... Why in hell would the Canucks keep Barker over Vandermeer?
Barker is not likely to suddenly learn how to play "defense" - and his supposed offensive prowess is questionable, and not needed on a team that has Edler, Garrison, Hamhuis, and Bieksa...
I just don't get it.
You're right that Barker sucks, but Vandermeer is pretty useless at this point in his career as well. Sure, he can throw a few punches, but he's not actually a good player in any way.
So it's essentially a wash as far as i'm concerned, which of the two blueliners they decided to waive.
It's just silly that they decided to wait this long to do it, and/or that they signed all these garbage extra depth blueliners in the first place really.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by biturbo19