View Single Post
Old
01-22-2013, 02:02 PM
  #12
semin4captain
Registered User
 
semin4captain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,979
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sens1Canes2 View Post
^ I think that's exactly what wallym said...the implication being the "adjustments" not taking place in spring/fall of 2008 when the more offensive-minded D was present.
But the start of 08-09 was really no different than the prior two seasons. The implication was that Lavi failed to adjust to the switch to more offensive D caused the team to allow a "bajillion goals", when really they were no worse defensively than the team was before under Laviolette. They allowed 2.84 goals per game in those 25 games, compared to 3.00, 3.02 and 3.15 the previous three years under Lavi.

Even if that was the case (team allowing a lot more goals because of failure to adjust to offensive D), certainly we can agree that it wasn't *just* the 08-09 season that got Lavi fired and that the previous two seasons played a large part?

Lavi's teams were allowing over three goals per game for a three year period with the vast majority of that time coming with mostly defensive D, then JR switches to more offensive D and they actually allow *less* and yet it's the presence of offensive D and Lavi's "failure to adjust" that caused the problem? Maybe Lavi's defensive system just sucked to begin with.


Last edited by semin4captain: 01-22-2013 at 02:09 PM.
semin4captain is offline   Reply With Quote