View Single Post
Old
01-22-2013, 02:03 PM
  #60
Community
Former TMLKesselftw
 
Community's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The Darkest Timeline
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,693
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunjay View Post
The first goal agains was a fluke deflection of a puck that was going wide, and Gunnar wasn't on the ice. You must be thinking of the second goal, where Gunnarsson was knocked down from behind away from the puck in the clearest example of interference you'll ever seein the NHL. He then got called himself on one of the weakest interference calls you'll ever see, i think on his very next shift. If you can't remember why you were disappointed with Gunnar in the Montreal game, maybe you should move on.

Honestly, I wish all the people talking about Gunnar being at fault for the second goal would actually watch the replay. The only person really at fault was Kulemin with the bad giveaway and backcheck, but even then it would have been fine if Gunnarsson wasn't knocked down.
I may have seen the wrong # in the play and thought Gunnar was Kulemin if what you're saying is right... I thought Kulemin was the man knocked down and Gunnar was the man that lost the puck as it was kinda hard to tell...

Community is online now   Reply With Quote