View Single Post
Old
01-22-2013, 05:38 PM
  #4
Regal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,590
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohashi_Jouzu View Post
Interesting phrasing of the question. I'd say Lindros was "better" in his prime, but because of everything we know in hindsight, Sakic had the better prime. Multiple, "full", 100 point seasons, Cups, etc.
Pretty much this. For one healthy game in their primes, it would be Lindros, but Sakic was able to stay healthy. Also, the sheer length of his prime is ridiculous. Top 10 in points as early as 1990 and as late as 2007.

Regal is offline   Reply With Quote