Thread: Proposal: Rangers/Maple Leafs
View Single Post
Old
01-23-2013, 01:56 PM
  #55
iamitter
Thornton's Hen
 
iamitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 3,587
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phatic View Post
ok, so leafs put connolly on re-entry waivers and rangers dont claim so they can trade a roster player for him? regardless, connolly clears waivers: how about franson and connolly for hagelin and bourque
No. We're just not trading an NHL player on our roster whos demonstrated chemistry with Richards and Gaborik for a bottom-pairing guy and an injury prone, overpaid player who doesn't fit into our lineup. Connolly has no value to us.

For us to acquire Franson, it would have to be something like a third+B level prospect. Trading Hagelin opens up a bigger hole than it solves.

iamitter is offline   Reply With Quote