Thread: Proposal: Rangers/Maple Leafs
View Single Post
Old
01-23-2013, 02:09 PM
  #58
Phatic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 551
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamitter View Post
No. We're just not trading an NHL player on our roster whos demonstrated chemistry with Richards and Gaborik for a bottom-pairing guy and an injury prone, overpaid player who doesn't fit into our lineup. Connolly has no value to us.

For us to acquire Franson, it would have to be something like a third+B level prospect. Trading Hagelin opens up a bigger hole than it solves.
ah ignorance. your response to my post clearly shows you have not read anything else from this thread. two separate posters from the rangers fan based asked about connolly, the later wanted him in a package deal. since the OP was trying to spin a deal around hagelin for franson, i threw in connolly and the leafs could use a center prospect coming back as well. the leafs can afford to eat some of connollys salary this year so thats hardly a concern.
so your attack on my post is far from warranted. if you have a problem with the pieces involved turn your frustrations toward the OP and your own fan base.

Phatic is offline   Reply With Quote