View Single Post
01-23-2013, 04:23 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 105
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by joshjull View Post
Bringing up Vancover serves what purpose exactly?

You'd rather get a 15% chance at a goal and I would prefer retaliation.

Which leads to my next point, aggressive hockey does include retaliating when things happen. Particularly when a team is trying to change their identity. Not sure why you think it doesn't.

I guess we'll agree to disagree. I grew up in the 70s/80s on a much more violent game. I prefer nasty aggressive hockey which includes responding when the goalie or teammate is run or given a cheapahot. You prefer dealing with that stuff with trying to get a PP goal.

To each their own.
Agreed. If you don't score on the ensuing power play, what kind of response have you sent?

Dfnswnschmpnshps is offline   Reply With Quote