View Single Post
01-23-2013, 08:34 PM
11 Stanley Cups
Agnostic's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,412
vCash: 500
So it comes down to this:

The Habs and Subban are in agreement on comparables and the money value of the contract.

The Habs want to preserve their policy of players signing a bridge contract before their full value contract.

Subban thinks his case deserves special treatment. Sounds like Subban knows what he wants.

So, does the damage caused by making an exception to policy outweigh the impact of losing Subban?

I think the scales tip in favour of PK. Time for the Habs to be practical and less dogmatic.

Agnostic is offline