View Single Post
Old
01-24-2013, 09:54 AM
  #13
triggrman
HFBoards Sponsor
 
triggrman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 18,921
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyfever View Post
The problem with this theory of letting Watson develop on the top 6 of the Admirals is that the coach in Milwaukee doesn't play Watson on the top 6. Watson is playing bottom 6 on the 3rd line. He sees little to no power play time and tonight so far after 1 period no power play time at all. Watson is now tied for the team lead in goals. How do you not play your top goal scorer on the power play? I don't know of any other team where they don't put their top goal goal scorer on the power play. The Admirals power play is now about 0-25. So with all of this going on I would say that Watson is not getting developed in Milwaukee at all so you might as well let him play about the same low amount of minutes in Nashville with him getting acclimated to the NHL.
That's not a good development plan.....

Bring him up if that's the case.

triggrman is offline   Reply With Quote