View Single Post
Old
01-24-2013, 10:14 AM
  #75
vecens24
Registered User
 
vecens24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 5,002
vCash: 500
Yeah I have no idea what Jafar is talking about here, I think he just kinda vetoed off the cuff automatically and now is just continuing to veto.

I can certainly see why people vetoed this in favor of Boston, but I probably would have been okay with it. Basically, it's the difference between having an upper-half #1 DMan here (#43-#63 is normally a huge run on #1 Ds with some forwards sprinkled in) for a bottom-third #1 DMan and an average 2nd line winger (although I'm 95% sure that VanI wasn't moving up for a D).

With how important #1 DMen are in this thing and how many minutes they play, I probably would have accepted this. As I said, the pick jump here is insanely big so I can see why people vetoed because Boston was getting a lot of picks here. But having said that our job isn't to make everything perfect. If people want to make a trade, our job is only to veto the truly outlandish ones. One thing that would help in that regard I think is if people posted WHY they want to make the trade along with the pick numbers.

Thanks to Bubba Boot for at least being understanding in this mess.

vecens24 is offline