View Single Post
01-25-2013, 01:17 AM
Rookie User
TheDoubleDion87's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Truculence Nation
Country: Canada
Posts: 215
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Bomber0104 View Post
I have a hard time thinking of players as soft and poor defensively as Phil Kessel.

If there are any, there aren't many at all...

I guess being extremely poor without the puck is not of value to NHL teams?
Semin and Kovalev just off the top of my head. He's certainly not as bad as those guys, I'm sure there are quite a few who are worse than him.

But yeah, he's not good without the puck. In the right circumstances I could see him being a 100 point guy, unfortunately we never made that a possibility for him.

TheDoubleDion87 is offline   Reply With Quote