Thread: On the Radio: RobR [Made some stuff up]
View Single Post
Old
01-25-2013, 09:00 AM
  #44
mpp9
Registered User
 
mpp9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 17,360
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KIRK View Post
Cole, Cole, Cole . . . we've discussed this before. I'll handle personnel, you've got the bench, and we're golden.

Really can't see San Jose. They're deep enough on defense to be o'k right now without Burns and Demers. IMO, they're a team that deals a guy like Murray when those two come back.

Winnipeg needs defense. Anything make sense?

St Louis doesn't need defense, but Redden is their #7 and their prospect pool on defense is limited. Thoughts?

Ottawa? Nashville? Montreal?

Minnesota would seem to be a pretty good fit of team needs.

LA needs affordable defensive help. Detroit too.

Maybe Dallas? Columbus?

Calgary seems to make a lot of sense. Piece of big package for Iginla and Glencross . . . Sid and Geno with two good wingers each, NHL issues retroactive clause to CBA banning that.



Definite match of needs . . . TK & Despres for Stewart
Calgary is a Pipedream. Last minute deadline Hossa type deal.

Minnesota makes alot of sense. Root for their rookies to play well this year.

As for the Blues. I doubt they'll change things unless they're getting a sure fire upgrade for Pietrangelo. Niskanen playing well with Letang has a deal written all over it. Especially if Despres builds on his last game and becomes reliable in his end.

Biggest question would be, is Despres a part of our longterm plans here. And does the coaching staff believe Niskanen can/should be a longterm partner for Letang.

mpp9 is offline