View Single Post
Old
01-25-2013, 10:10 PM
  #51
McVespa99
Registered User
 
McVespa99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,098
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundgarden View Post
You mean give up our top prospect at a position we are starved at for an often injured 30 year old. Oh boy can we add our 1st too! In his last three seasons Hemsky's played 22, 47 and 69 games. Watson will be good, how good we don't know yet, but we aren't giving him up for an injured 30 year old.

Would you honestly build your offense around Hemsky? Yeah, me neither.
Just because he is your top prospect at a position does not mean he is anything special. It may just mean your prospects at that position are not great.
I would probably not build my offense around Hemsky but he is a damn good secondary player. Pretty close to ppg when healthy and the repairs done on him last year seem to have worked out.
If you want someone young, 100% healthy, dynamic scorer etc you will need to give up one of the players that you deem untouchable or it will never happen

McVespa99 is offline   Reply With Quote