View Single Post
01-25-2013, 10:37 PM
Smug Teuvo
HockeySensible's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,590
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by LarmerSavardSecord View Post
The buyout option is a little rough. He makes too little to be eligible for a compliance buyout, so it would have to be a dead cap space-eating standard buyout over four years ($1.2m, 1.5, 0.7, 0.7). If he's ever cleared the hawks could put him in Rockford and take a $1.7m cap hit and see how it goes or hopes he retires, try to trade him to a cap floor team and while retaining 50% of his salary (leaving ~$1m per for that team), or just play him thinking he's better than the net of his cap hit-minus buyout (can earn ~$1.5m) while believing there is depth in Rockford if/when he's injured to replace him. All of those options are probably better than just carrying his buyout cap hit for 4 years.
Any player can be bought-out with the compliance buyout. It was only for this season, an accelerated compliance buyout, where a player had to be making at least 3M and the reason they put that in place was so Redden and Gomez didn't have to sit out all year.

HockeySensible is offline   Reply With Quote