Thread: Proposal: Phi-ana
View Single Post
Old
01-26-2013, 02:57 AM
  #49
Snotbubbles
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,487
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightyquack View Post

The money owed, and the length, it's a killer for a franchise who has never handed out more then a 5 year contract.

End of the day, if Flyers fans are happy with Bryz (which appears to be the case in this thread), then there is no reason for the trade.
If the Ducks plan on keeping Hiller after his contract is up next season, then the money still owed to Bryz and the money that will be owed Hiller will be in the same ballpark. You'd have to think Hiller will be looking for a 4-5 year contract around 6M per. So you're talking about a 5-6 year committment (next year at 4.5 and then an extension) at around 29-35M total compensation. Compared to Bryz's 7 years, 34.5M remaining after this year.

I fully understand the argument that you have Gibson in the wings, but the counter is, if you want to keep Hiller, you have to make a committment to him. He's not gonna sign a 2 year deal to be a placeholder for Gibson.

Snotbubbles is offline   Reply With Quote