View Single Post
01-26-2013, 10:23 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,861
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
Stern wants Seattle to get a team back but he's not going to make the same mistake twice doing it. If this goes through, all he's doing is making up the Seattle mistake by making Sacramento the mistake.

You also completely falsify the league's stances towards litigation like this. If any of that crap were true, Seattle wouldn't even be in the discussion for a team because they did this when they lost their team.

And yes, this was a quick deal. Even if you believe your story, two months is a short time for a sale process of this size. And just because Hansen, the NBA, and their lawyers don't believe it is a huge issue doesn't mean much of anything. The courts will decide and it wouldn't impact announcing it in the slightest because they'd have to go through with it one way or the other.
If you noticed seattle's breach of contract lawsuit was settled and schultz lawsuit against Bennett was dropped and guess what the NBA wasn't happy about either of those lawsuit.

Umm NBA is not expanding anytime soon if NBA wants a team in seattle guess what they have to relocate a team from another city.

And if BOG votes this down stern will retire as the person that shafted seattle twice thus giving the NBA another black eye and a HUGE PR nightmare.

And i am moving on. No point in arguing anymore.

gstommylee is online now   Reply With Quote