*ALL* Luongo Talk (News/Speculation/Rumors/Proposals)
View Single Post
01-27-2013, 12:24 AM
Join Date: Jan 2013
Originally Posted by
NYR gave up to top-6 forwards to land Nash...
Common sense is that if you can deal from a position of strength to deal with an area of weakness, you'd do it. According to you every hockey trade would always be roster player for futures, as a team is either contending or rebuilding.
According to you, a 28 year old Nash as a forward is the same thing as a 33 year old Luongo wiht a 10 year contract.
Rangers didnt NEED to get Nash. They added to their already contending lineup that almost won the presidents trophy.
A team would NEED Luongo in order to go trade for him. Goaltending is a different situation.
Your comparison of the two trades is not comparable.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Wizeman*