*ALL* Luongo Talk (News/Speculation/Rumors/Proposals)
View Single Post
01-27-2013, 12:29 AM
Spread the love
Join Date: May 2012
Originally Posted by
According to you, a 28 year old Nash as a forward is the same thing as a 33 year old Luongo wiht a 10 year contract.
Rangers didnt NEED to get Nash. They added to their already contending lineup that almost won the presidents trophy.
A team would NEED Luongo in order to go trade for him. Goaltending is a different situation.
Your comparison of the two trades is not comparable.
Any team could decide "Hey, our goaltending with Holtby/Lindback/Crawford/Dubnyk/etc has been terrible. If we gave up Johansson/Malone/Hemsky/etc + throw in for a huge upgrade in goal, we would be a much better team."
And that's all it boils down to. A trade that makes both teams better. I don't expect Luongo to garner as much as Nash did. But the premise of making a deal to benefit both teams remains.
View Public Profile
Vankiller Whale's albums
Find More Posts by Vankiller Whale