View Single Post
01-26-2013, 11:52 PM
Born & Bred In Maine
Join Date: Nov 2011
I really hope the plan they tanked last year doesn't come back. The Florida teams in the NE was so stupid.
Here was my proposal:
PRINCE OF WALES CONFERENCE
Toronto Maple Leafs
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
New Jersey Devils
Detroit Red Wings
Columbus Blue Jackets
Tampa Bay Lightning
CLARENCE CAMPBELL CONFERENCE
St. Louis Blues
San Jose Sharks
Los Angeles Kings
There's bound to be some unhappiness here, especially by splitting the Rangers/Devils away from the Flyers/Penguins. Unfortunately, there's no real way around it. It's mitigated somewhat by putting Detroit into the Patrick Division, along with Washington.
***Alternatively, you could keep the NYR/NYI/NJD in the Patrick, and put DET/CBJ/WAS ino the Adams.
Same frustrations in pulling Detroit out of the current Central. You lose that rivalry with the Blackhawks. But it gets all Eastern Time Zone teams to the Eastern Conference, and the Blackhawks should gain some good games with the Wild/Avalanche/Jets. Over time these will work out nicely.
The schedule will work as follows...
Each Wales Conference Team plays their own division opponents 4 times, two home, and two away.
7 X 4 =
Each Wales Conference Team plays their other Conference division opponents 3 times, alternating home ice each year.
8 x 3 =
Each Wales Conference Team plays each Campbell Conference team twice, one home, one away.
14 x 2 =
This is an
80 game schedule.
Each Campbell Conference Team plays their own division opponents 4 times, two home, and two away.
6 X 4 =
Each Campbell Conference Team plays their other Conference division opponents 3 times alternating home ice each year.
7 x 3 =
Each Campbell Conference Team plays each Wales Conference Team twice, one home, one away.
16 x 2 =
This is a
77 game schedule.
You'll notice the Western teams only have a 77 game schedule. This is tough. The easiest way I've found to make it work is those last 3 games are played within the division, with a 4 year rotation. For example,
In Year 1, VAN plays an extra divisional game against SJ, @LA, and @ANA.
In Year 2, VAN plays an extra divisional game against EDM, CGY, and @PHX.
In Year 3, VAN plays an extra divisional game against @SJ, LA, and ANA.
In Year 4, VAN plays an extra divisional game against @EDM, @CGY, and PHX.
This way, every 4 years, you get an extra two games against each division opponent, one home, one away.
Playoff seeding works thusly:
16 team playoff, same as now. 8 teams from each Conference. Top 2 teams in each Division get guaranteed Playoff Berths. The remaining 4 spots in each Conference are the teams with the highest points.
Yes, this means, in theory, the Western teams have a slightly better chance to get into the playoffs, as the last 4 playoff spots are pulled from 10 teams instead of 12. While East Coast teams may view this as unfair, there is a reasoning behind it. Western teams each have to play 3 extra divisional games, and Western teams also have to travel more. These are slight disadvantages, which, in my opinion, equal out the slight advantage in regards to Playoff Berths.
Seeding, and home ice is based on points, nothing else. If the Bruins are 2nd in the Adams Division with 91 points, they are guaranteed a spot. But if they're 5th in points behind Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Washington, and Detroit, tough luck. They're a 5 seed, and don't have home ice advantage.
As the NHL does now, teams are reseeded after each round.
To determine Home Ice for the Stanley Cup Final, we look at which team has a better winning percentage against the other conference.
Thoughts? Opinions? I haven't exactly gone in and worked out a specific schedule. I would imagine it could get a little complicated, especially out West, making sure teams get 40 home and 40 road games a year. But still, I think it's pretty good.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by MSPGabe