View Single Post
Old
01-27-2013, 10:40 AM
  #22
jas
Unsatisfied
 
jas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 12,978
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Melnyk View Post
OK, you ornery *******, I have no problem with switching STEPAN and Arnott then because of comptability issues and/or the desire not to go with one big line and and a smaller, faster more tenacious one....The problem is STEPAN is neither fast nor tenacios and is usually quite the prancer on the ice..Very skilled but with issues..

My main point of the lines is that ARNOOT will be playing top 9 and KREIDER will not be playing unless injury strikes...
Good to hear from you again...always good to see the oldtimers come around. Anyway, this Stepan-Callahan thing his become my pet peeve, so I get a little testy when I see so many trying to put two players who do not work together on the same line, just because of some silly notion about 1st, 2nd and 3rd line players. Ideally, Stepan should have either Gaborik or Nash on his RW to spread out the offense, but, right now, that 1st line has been beastly, and Nash and Gaborik seem to be developing chemistry, so why not ride it for awhile?

jas is offline   Reply With Quote