View Single Post
01-27-2013, 08:23 PM
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 961
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by KIRK View Post
I'd give Malkin a minus for 2/3 of the game, but Malkin and Neal looked better with Glass in the third period of this game than they've looked with anyone else all season. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think you'll find yourself in a small minority on this one.

EDIT: Just looked. Malkin was credited with 4 takeaways in this game, and I'm pretty sure all of them came in the third . . . with Glass out there with him. He's not a solution, but he's better than any alternative, I think.
Uh, while they may have looked more disruptive... look at the shot count? After one good shift they did nothing close. Glass fumbled the puck multiple times trying to pass, etc. Love Glass, he just doesn't have the skills to be on that line. Sorry.

sexyllama is offline   Reply With Quote