Thread: Trade Rumors
View Single Post
Old
01-28-2013, 06:26 PM
  #40
SLang
Registered User
 
SLang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 3,782
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Live in the Now View Post
The idea at play would be that swapping one defenseman for another defenseman who can play huge minutes ultimately decreases responsibility on the bottom pairing, thus decreasing the need for greater depth.
Yah I get that I suppose but gaining a defenseman at the expense of a reliable (and Stanley Cup-winning) defenseman just seems like treading water.

SLang is offline