View Single Post
Old
01-29-2013, 03:21 PM
  #716
hockeylegend11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,052
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by aresknights View Post
The Petes are a hot mess for many more "controlable" reasons than revenue sharing. Bad example. The management/ownership and inability to provide an atmosphere condusive to winning, developing and having a happy dressing room is where Id start. Money aint helping them. Its more about decision making and leadership from the top. The Spits, Kitchener nor London (or any1 else making$) shouldnt have to prop up ineffective, or just outright crappily run teams
While I agree that the Petes are poorly run,they did say in article that I read that they cant afford the edc packages I was speaking about I am not making that up,their budget dont allow it
The league will probably give them some of the 250,000 Windsor paid to prop them up, a form of revenue sharing right

hockeylegend11 is offline