View Single Post
Old
01-30-2013, 01:29 PM
  #504
BlindWillyMcHurt
Registered User
 
BlindWillyMcHurt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 8,611
vCash: 500
I agree with all of that.

What always gets me, personally, is when pundits (particularly locally) pull out the "quality depth" card. WHAT DEPTH? The kind that you can find on the waiver wire on a good day, you mean? Yeah... really impressive.

You mean all of that awesome defensive depth? Is that why Lovejoy is playing as much as he is? Or are guys that are still at least a year or two away actually considered viable depth on an NHL roster?

You mean the complimentary scoring forwards? The ones that don't exist anywhere in the organization?

That's the biggest myth of the Penguins organization. "Quality depth."

Well... that and they're "well coached" because Disco has a Jack Adams.

BlindWillyMcHurt is offline   Reply With Quote