View Single Post
Old
01-30-2013, 05:14 PM
  #64
CobraAcesS
Registered User
 
CobraAcesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Country: United States
Posts: 12,290
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by henchman24 View Post
Well... at least Sacco views him as a center instead of just shoving him over to the wing. I'm trying to stay positive with Sacco's lines
One thing about showcasing him at center is that, if he does have some success his value shoots through the roof. Not only in viability but in a more valuable position.

Kobasew - Sgar - Hejduk / I don't mind this line combo that much, Kobasew is fairly good at forchecking (When hes up to speed) and Hejduk can put the puck in the net, as well as pass.

For what we have to give him, hes getting setup for success as much as possible. I'm not surprised Mitchell is getting a shot with Stastny's line. His puck possession, and willingness to shoot has been good.

McGinn - Duchene - Parenteau / Looked good and was the only thing that worked last game.

Also if this works... Landeskog can be given a try next to Stastny. Which I'm starting to agree with a few people in thinking Stastny might be better for Landeskog in that he likes to slow down the game a bit more.

Landeskog wasn't bad with Duchene, but Duchene likes to drive possession himself a bit more. With Stastny, Landeskog can focus on a hard nosed simple game.

Gawd I hate Jones... Can we have one more McGinn/Landeskog type player please? That way one or both of them can play with Stastny. Why couldn't Jones have been the one to get injured instead of Downie?

Jones/Casper is the reason I would be ok with trading O'Reilly for Ryan... Landeskog - Stastny - Ryan / McGinn - Duchene - PA? Just get Jones the hell out of the top 6, and hopefully off the team so they stop putting him back there.


Last edited by CobraAcesS: 01-30-2013 at 05:21 PM.
CobraAcesS is online now   Reply With Quote