View Single Post
01-31-2013, 05:45 PM
Redgren Grumbholdt
Registered User
Redgren Grumbholdt's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Grenyarnia
Country: United States
Posts: 4,020
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by STLBLUES44 View Post
Hypothetically speaking if we get a legit 2C and remember i'm saying "HYPOTHETICALLY" Do you guys think that a third line of jaskin/ berglund/ Rattie in three years could be a good line? I like the mix of power, defensive play and scoring ability that all three could possibly bring to the table if they keep working hard and are able to take there games to the next level. I'm not looking for answers like NO THAT WOULDN'T HAPPEN WE HAVE STEWART ETC... I just wanna know if you think that combination in a few years could have good chemistry and maybe be an effective line. I know it's WAY to early to really tell. I just wanna see your guys opinions and thought on how rattie and jaskin could progress and what kind of players you think they could be 3 years down the road
The success of a line is a fickle thing, even when you find one that works, like with McTaraeen, there is still a good chance that it will be broken up for much of the game. Its not something I typically worry about several seasons in advance.

But that line could work. My biggest complaint is that none of those guys is a natural passer, although I think that it is a strength of Rattie (and to an extent, Jaskin as well- Id call him an average passer with good vision). Bergie is a puck possessor, but IMO has weak vision and average passing ability.

Redgren Grumbholdt is offline   Reply With Quote