View Single Post
Old
02-01-2013, 11:36 PM
  #32
Stranger Danger
the
 
Stranger Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lanc. PA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,225
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by toughfighter83 View Post
why do you refuse to accept that these players are not good enough because of a first year fluke? why not get rid of them for someone better? so what if they win cups with other teams and for good reason if they get better players then them and still competing, at least it's something to build on.
Why is it a first year fluke? They are YOUNG, you don't trade kids who had 95% of there time in the nhl playing really good, and judge them on the 5% bad. Is it more realistic too think it was a first year fluke? or that during a lock-out shortened season, maybe they didnt get enough practice time with the team to automatically start where they left off? In 7 games? Or maybe the dreaded sophmore slump really sucks when you have so many of them?

Stranger Danger is offline   Reply With Quote