Redmond & Postma > Hainsey & Clitsome?
View Single Post
02-02-2013, 10:51 AM
Join Date: Jul 2012
Originally Posted by
There is no way Hainsey is a #4 on a legit stanley cup contender
Maybe not, but he is a perfectly fine fourth D on most teams with legitimate playoff aspirations.
The coupling of Clitsome and Hainsey together in this thread is just wrong, IMO. By almost any objective measure, Hainsey is a better, safer D than Clitsome ever was. Why he is such a lightning rod for criticism is baffling.
BTW, I'd be perfectly fine to trade Hainsey for real value if we have a losing record by game 20, precisely because he has high worth in this market and because we are still building for the future.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by scelaton