View Single Post
Old
02-03-2013, 12:08 AM
  #12
KingKopitar11*
Drew Doughty Eh?
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: staples center
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 16,404
vCash: 500
Our team when they aren't giving it a 100% almost always loses, our playing style requires a lot of energy to be effective. Anaheim has attacking the net mentality as soon as they were in our zone, they never stopped to set up, or forecheck. Players like stoll and fraser who are primarily the power forwards are realistically useless.

When our top 6 is doing nothing at all, what does that tell you? How come we were 28th in scoring again so far or something like that. It's either our players or our system. Its both though. There's not many players we have that can actually shoot with precision. We are more talented than Anaheim or close to it on offense, we out shot them, we had more possession, but they have execution. They have players that automatically attack the net, set up in the slot, they dont wait to set up, they dont throw as much as hits as we do. But they execute. You get rid of the players who bring nothing when they have no effort. Carter when he's invisible still has a shot and can pot in a goal with a bad game. Penner when he's invisible brings nothing, Loktionov, Vey, Toffoli in that regards would do better than Penner, Stoll, Fraser.

Just my idea. I understand this is how we won our Cup, but **** when we dont play with energy we are absolutely neutralized. Anaheim played with no energy and won. Our system is too risky.But this will likely never happen since its drastic so in that case, get rid of Penner and someone else who cant score and put Toffoli and Loktionov on a line together. That seems so much better.

KingKopitar11* is offline   Reply With Quote