View Single Post
Old
07-03-2006, 12:55 AM
  #30
Quiet Robert
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,261
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Macho Man View Post
Blind Guardian.

No. just No. I respect your posts more than those of anyone else on this board. But Richer? a floater who tries once ever 3 games who's been out of the game for years? The guy who offered his services to Gainey already (during his retirement) and Gainey said "I'll think about it" and we never heard from him again?.
Agree to disagree. Richer would serve very well on our 2nd line. In shootouts he would be deadly. The guy is a true sniper, which we lack.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Macho Man View Post
No. And Petrov can't do what Samsonov can do. Samsonov is shifier, is more injury prone and has a better shot. Check their career stats, there is a clear disctinction to be made in their production too.
Petrov got 47 in the "old" NHL which means he would get at least 65 next year with us. Petrov-Koivu-Richer :drool: that line would rock so hard it's not even funny. I think that put side by side, Petrov would far outshine Samsonov next year. Plus, at 5'9 he has the size that Samsonov doesn't have.

Quiet Robert is offline   Reply With Quote