View Single Post
02-07-2013, 03:01 PM
Registered User
McRanger's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,401
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Tortorella View Post
Nope. I think it's hypocrisy at it's finest to consider Nash a franchise player when his own ice play suggest otherwise. Nash and Havlat are both 1st line players, nothing more. Yet one is talked up like he is a generational talent.
"Generational talent" and "franchise player" are two completely different things. There are so many definitions of the latter that Nash probably fits more than a few of them. I would be surprised if he was ever called the former.

As for Havlat, they have pretty much an identical PPG unless you want to go into several decimals. Nash also has significantly more goals, has played with significantly less talent and is not extremely injury prone.

McRanger is offline   Reply With Quote