View Single Post
Old
12-17-2003, 06:35 AM
  #15
Guest
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,246
vCash: 500
It doesn't make much sense that Philly would send a 1st, 3rd, and Wowy for Comrie, when they could have just sent the 1st to Phoenix for Burke alone. Comrie for Burke alone makes no sense, and everyone should realize that.

Not sure what the Coyotes would have to throw in the deal to acquire Comrie, but I truely don't feel like there is an issue. However I do wonder if Comrie is not going to just be flipped to another team, as Edmonton had a unique situation on what they wanted in return, Philly would be much more open.

I think it may be a hard time for Philly to get another goalie on roster because they want to keep Esche up as well, and Hackett has a NTC. Kind of harsh for Philly to sign and trade Hackett after acquiring his replacement. Again, just doesn't make sense.

Where there is smoke, there is fire, so Comrie might not be done here, I just don't see this rumor coming to fruition.

Guest is offline