Thread: News Article: Less padding = more production
View Single Post
02-10-2013, 09:27 PM
Registered User
Scurr's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Whalley
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,056
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Hank4Hart View Post
Now. If you wanna say that better technology should be invented so that a smaller chest protector can be made while being just as protective. I have no problem with that. But as of today's goaltending equipment technology, any slight reduction (as seen by Mason's case) will result in bruises all over.
A goalie with a 28-32 inch waist can wrap themselves in 3 inches of protection without ending up being 50+ inches around. There is no reason to "protect" 6 inches above the collar bone either.

If you don't want bruises then don't play sports. There are guys willing to get in front of those same shots with far less padding. Suck it up princess.

Originally Posted by Reverend Mayhem View Post
Anyone that can overlook that and blame on equipment size should re-evaluate their argument and logical reasoning, to be quite frank.
You're only looking at one piece of his equipment. He's still covers 20%+ more net than he should.

Scurr is offline   Reply With Quote