View Single Post
02-11-2013, 12:37 AM
Registered User
Eskimo44's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,684
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Hardyvan123 View Post
Well I guess this is progress form the "he isn't in the top 50 of all time forwards" where we started here.
This is a blatant lie, i never once said that. I said he's not "ensured to be a top 50 forward", i also said "i could list close to 50 players that were better or at least arguably better". Which is to say there are certainly arguments for numerous players being ranked ahead of him. Look at it this way the NHL has over 100 years of history, to be top 50 means, assuming we give equal weight to all decades, that he was a top 5 forward for his decade. You really don't need to fabricate things, i try to respond to things you said and i don't put words in your mouth, so i would certainly appreciate if you didn't do it to me. Have you even been reading what i'm writing or just assuming what i''m writing based on some key words you noticed?

Note: the word arguably means that it's up for debate. I really think the issue is you are very confused with what i had said to begin with.

Eskimo44 is offline   Reply With Quote