View Single Post
02-11-2013, 07:53 AM
Gary says it's A-OK
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: the Prior
Originally Posted by
I think what he is saying is that Tukka Rask had no interest signing with the Leafs at the time.
Then when questioned qualified that by saying Tukka Rask had no interest signing with the Leafs at the time unless they overpaid for him.
It's the same thing except the second time he/she went into more detail...
Splitting statements up into finite conclusions based on passing thoughts will really degrade anyone's point into a pointless conversation.
Who cares if within 3 mins of talking he/she goes on to further explain where they are coming from?
no that isn't what it's about, but thanks for tryin Marty you've been very helpful
what it's about is that people have rationalizations that support whatever beliefs they hold because of a need to blame somebody for Leaf ills it is easier to believe that trading Rask was just a further manifestation of JFj incompetance then it being a decision made because of expedience.
the truth is always subjective and thats cool
what is true is RASK was not signed and showed no inclination of signing, the Leafs needed a goaltender Manny Legace wanted way too much to come to Toronto and Raycroft was made available
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by therealkoho