View Single Post
02-12-2013, 09:29 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Scottsdale, AZ.
Country: United States
Posts: 1,162
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by GuelphStormer View Post
can anyone point to any sort of recent study that supports the contention that "glendale is better off with the coyotes than without them"? apart from the four year old hocking report, has anything ever been done on this?
Such a report or information related to the efficacy of this franchise remaining does not exist! The reason being is that a back of the napkin analysis is all that is needed to see that this deal will not only never make a dime for potential investors, but with the team gone the city is far better off. If an investment group would like to take a run at this w/o COG subsidies, be my guest! The city has internal docs that lucidly show the cost to the city of extending the heavy subsidies vs. letting the team walk. The city is better off w/o the team and no subsidies!

mesamonster is offline