View Single Post
Old
02-12-2013, 02:09 PM
  #34
OlTimeHockey
Registered User
 
OlTimeHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: home
Country: China
Posts: 15,692
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluechipbonzo View Post
Fact is any move around money will always be seen by the haters as a negative.

Because it's the Islanders, it's an "issue".

Any other team would have been applauded for this cap flexibility move.

HFers don't see this because the new CBA hasn't been explained to them yet.

haters....you mean fans that don't enjoy minimal talent being put on ice for them to spend good money on tickets to see while prices go up and quality is inconsequential to ownership who strangles the team each year, rushing kids one year and filling 1/ of the roster with waiver fodder the next? That kinda haters?

I guess you have a Hickey jersey at home?

Cap flexibility.....one trade of "aged" Streit and we're below the cap. We can dump more NHL talent and Wang will be spending well under the cap. But we are simpletons....cap rules scare us.

Wang good, fire BAD!

OlTimeHockey is offline   Reply With Quote