View Single Post
02-12-2013, 11:29 PM
Bryanbryoil's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 62,327
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
Gagner was fighting to create something on the pk with the game winding down anyway. Not like it cost us the game. Jaromir actually scored on the 4 on 4 anyway.

hate to say this again but N Schultz is NOT what people advertised here. Which is what I said all along.

This guy is not a shutdown D and not even close. Gets completely owned, bent over, and schooled on the last Dallas goal as he flails away getting beat to the net.

Thats our shutdown D isolated folks. Without J Schultz, a rookie carrying him it would be ugly. No accident that Tambo covers this botched trade by pairing the best D we've had in years with N Schultz.
We still had time left and you almost never should be happy about a penalty that far from your goal especially when it negates the PP. And it created the 4 on 4 which killed us, was Jagr killing penalties? If not then he wouldn't have seen the ice there.

N. Schultz made a bad play and it put us even deeper in the hole, but let's be honest, the Jagr goal put the game out of reach. It seemed pretty well out of reach once our PP got cut short and prior to that things looked already grim.

Bryanbryoil is offline   Reply With Quote