Has Gagner proven to you to be a legit 2C?
View Single Post
02-14-2013, 09:19 AM
Join Date: Aug 2011
Originally Posted by
Its interesting that 85% of respondents in the poll feel Gagner is a legit number 2C but the majority of posts we see on this topic are from the few posters that think he isn't. For years, all day any day we've heard this. Typically from posters that have to express it 50 times/week.
Where they at now?
Must be tough Gagner hating days.
Hmm! In every thread and every day we can hear from you about Gagners development this year! First it was whitneys fault that sam and his line was - and bleeding 5 on 5, but that misunderstanding has been cleared lately. I dont know what player who suits Gagner in this team for you to like? It always another players fault to explain shortcomings from him.
That line is statistic horrible so far 5 on 5 and Gagner and Hemsky the worst of all in all defensive columns. Your development hasnt appear and almost every column 5 on 5 proves that.
He has still horrible defensive numbers, corsi etc.
The illusion that you try to make a truth with freaquently postings everywhere hasnt appear yet. Its good that Gagner producing but he has always done that in pp. When the team is among the best in the leuage at pp, it has even more impact on Gagners numbers and he flying under the radar in other ways.
I voted legit c but trade, because we need a better fit in that important position.
He is only on a 1 year tryout this year, so he isnt a proven 2 c in this team yet.
(compare earlier years)
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by McClelland