View Single Post
02-15-2013, 09:27 PM
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,048
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by SnowblindNYR View Post
Can you please respond to your logical fallacies please? Do you believe that the Rangers were a Nash away from the Cup? If so, was the team a good team or do you think so highly of Nash that you think he could transform a garbage team into a cup winner?
What I think is what most of my friends who have common sense believe and that's this;
"When you have a legitimate chance to compete for a cup(as we did last year), then it is incumbent of your GM to do whatever is humanly possible to improve the team's chances."
Rick Nash would have made a big difference in our lineup last year, don't you think?
I think we could have gotten by the Devils with him but not the Kings.

Just my opinion, mind you.

Drewbackatu* is offline