View Single Post
02-17-2013, 04:08 PM
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,811
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by The Dangley One View Post
Well this makes zero sense. So you basically want to just trade him to make room. Why not trade/re assign a lesser d men, unless you have 6 d men better than gunnarson, in which case that would mean that gunnarson is not nearly as good as some people suggested, which was my original point.
Actually, it makes perfect sense. You trade the guy who would bring the biggest return, that you could somewhat replace internally.

We have Phaneuf, Gunnarsson, Liles, Gardiner, Franson, Komisarek, Fraser, Holzer, and Kostka that have all showed they can play NHL minutes. That is 9 players. The only person that can go through waivers without being lost is Gardiner. We also may have Rielly and Ranger in the mix next year as well.

Whydidijoin* is offline   Reply With Quote