View Single Post
02-18-2013, 05:36 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Oulu
Country: Finland
Posts: 14,583
vCash: 50
Originally Posted by habsfanatics View Post
Sakic has the clear and decisive edge career wise. I don't dispute that. I dispute that at their absolute bests Yzerman was a better player.

Why would you discount voters opinions because in your mind they are not in the hf history section elite club? Many voters, like myself have followed both of their careers in their entirety, but don't spend countless hrs a day debating it on here, so therefore our opinions aren't as valuable or likely to be as accurate as those who do spend countless hrs debating in this section(some who have never seen them at their best BTW)? How does one gain membership to this club?
To be fair, as a "non HoH-elite member" i think you make good points. Whenever i read your posts i think of you as one of the better debaters of this board.

That said, i am not even sure the difference on peak (one season) is that much different that it would make case for overcoming Sakic's better career.

I actually think there is case for Sakic of the better season between these two.

TAnnala is offline   Reply With Quote