Thread: Proposal: Omark/Filatov
View Single Post
Old
02-18-2013, 12:48 PM
  #69
ViCiieux
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 965
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hall04 View Post
And you haven't even seen the two players I guess.
Also you are calling Silfverberg for Silfverburg, says it all really.

Your the only guy on the whole boards suggesting Omark is better then Silfverberg, maybe you haven't seen the 2 play ? What makes you think I haven't seen the 2 play ? I'd really like to know .
Maybe somebodys just a little angry that I called them 10.

And jeez I spelt his last name wrong ... By one letter. I obviously have never seen him play
(On my bb, dont know how to quote)
They have two different playstyles. They have equal stats.
I just think Omark can be an impact player just the way you think Silfverberg can be an impact player.

Some quotes from Ottawa GDT;
"I am wholly underwhelmed by Silfverburg's play. I get that same feeling I got when watching Rundblad thinking "he will not translate well to the NHL."
"Silf is terrible."

ViCiieux is offline   Reply With Quote